Contractors DirectoryInformation on every contractor in United States

New Construction Permits in Irvine, CA

35 Hallmark, Irvine, CA 92620

Date: Aug 19, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 1 duplex. bldg #16. with sprinklers 3537 hallmark units 4342 las casella ii phase 8 woodbury

Valuation: $47,833,100

Fee: $6,381.54 paid to City of Irvine, California

Client: Lennar Communities

Permit #: 00506608-RBP

56 Rolling Green, Irvine, CA 92620

Date: Aug 19, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 1 production sfd plan type 3a sonoma phase 14 woodbury

Valuation: $27,814,600

Fee: $3,971.92 paid to City of Irvine, California

Client: Irvine Community Development C

Permit #: 00507579-RBP

35 Hallmark, Irvine, CA 92620

Date: Aug 19, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 1 duplex & 1 triplexwith sprinklers tract 17324. lots 8 & 9. units 42-46 las casella ii phase 8 wood

Client: Lennar Communities

Permit #: 00505361-RNC

64 Rolling Green, Irvine, CA 92620

Date: Aug 19, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 1 production sfd plan type 2ar sonoma phase 14 woodbury

Valuation: $27,371,300

Fee: $3,890.23 paid to City of Irvine, California

Client: Irvine Community Development C

Permit #: 00507575-RBP

34 Roycroft, Irvine, CA 92620

Date: Aug 19, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 1 duplex & 1 triplex with sprinklers tract 17324. lots 6- 7. units 47-49 5051 las casella ii phase 7

Client: Lennar Communities

Permit #: 00505374-RNC

62 Rolling Green, Irvine, CA 92620

Date: Aug 19, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 1 production sfd plan type 1cr sonoma phase 14 woodbury

Valuation: $24,968,500

Fee: $3,593.93 paid to City of Irvine, California

Client: Irvine Community Development C

Permit #: 00507576-RBP

29 Hallmark, Irvine, CA 92620

Date: Aug 19, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 1 triplex. bldg #17. with sprinklers 29 31 33 hallmark units 46 45 44 las casella ii phase 8 woodbur

Valuation: $59,652,600

Fee: $8,140.29 paid to City of Irvine, California

Client: Lennar Communities

Permit #: 00506609-RBP

68 Rolling Green, Irvine, CA 92620

Date: Aug 19, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 1 production sfd plan type 2cr sonoma phase 14 woodbury

Valuation: $26,221,700

Fee: $3,773.28 paid to City of Irvine, California

Client: Irvine Community Development C

Permit #: 00507573-RBP

66 Rolling Green, Irvine, CA 92620

Date: Aug 19, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 1 production sfd plan type 1br/ rev #1 issued 9/20/10 sonoma phase 14 woodbury

Valuation: $26,303,000

Fee: $3,748.29 paid to City of Irvine, California

Client: Irvine Community Development C

Permit #: 00507574-RBP

58 Rolling Green, Irvine, CA 92620

Date: Aug 19, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 1 production sfd plan type 2dr sonoma phase 14 woodbury

Valuation: $27,332,900

Fee: $3,881.69 paid to City of Irvine, California

Client: Irvine Community Development C

Permit #: 00507578-RBP

34 Roycroft, Irvine, CA 92620

Date: Aug 19, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 1 duplex bldg 19 34 36 roycroft units 50 51 las casella ii phase 7 woodbury

Valuation: $47,833,100

Fee: $6,382.29 paid to City of Irvine, California

Client: Lennar Communities

Permit #: 00506692-RBP

52 Land Grant, Irvine, CA 92618

Contractor: Van Daele Development Corporation

Date: Aug 30, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 3 model det condos, plans 1ax, 2b, 3c**review canceled- see notes** 50, 52, 54 land grant, tr 17367, lot 16 sevilla, models, portola springs

Client: Van Daele Development

Permit #: 00508267-RNC

76 Scarlet Bloom, Irvine, CA 92618

Date: Sep 1, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 1 det prod condo plan 3 unit 26 casero phase 1 portola springs

Valuation: $24,553,900

Fee: $3,512.38 paid to City of Irvine, California

Client: Standard Pacific Homes

Permit #: 00508320-RBP

58 Long Grass, Irvine, CA 92618

Date: Sep 1, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 1 det prod condo plan 1 unit 28 casero phase 2 portola springs

Valuation: $20,944,700

Fee: $3,047.38 paid to City of Irvine, California

Client: Standard Pacific Homes

Permit #: 00508351-RBP

60 Long Grass, Irvine, CA 92618

Date: Sep 1, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 1 det prod condo plan 3 unit 29 casero phase 2 portola springs

Valuation: $24,553,900

Fee: $3,512.38 paid to City of Irvine, California

Client: Standard Pacific Homes

Permit #: 00508356-RBP

225 Mantle, Irvine, CA 92620

Contractor: Van Daele Development Corporation

Date: Sep 1, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 1 production sfd plan 3a without sprinklers santa cruz phase 13 woodbury east

Valuation: $25,857,000

Fee: $3,687.31 paid to City of Irvine, California

Client: Irvine Community Development C

Parcel #: 71

Permit #: 00508392-RBP

72 Scarlet Bloom, Irvine, CA 92618

Date: Sep 1, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 1 det prod condo plan 3 units 24 casero phase 1 portola springs

Valuation: $24,553,900

Fee: $3,512.38 paid to City of Irvine, California

Client: Standard Pacific Homes

Permit #: 00508319-RBP

74 Scarlet Bloom, Irvine, CA 92618

Date: Sep 1, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 1 det prod condo plan 2 (early california) unit 25 casero phase 1 portola springs

Valuation: $21,479,700

Fee: $3,102.37 paid to City of Irvine, California

Client: Standard Pacific Homes

Permit #: 00508317-RBP

78 Scarlet Bloom, Irvine, CA 92618

Date: Sep 1, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 1 det prod condo plan 2 unit 27 casero phase 1 portola springs

Valuation: $21,837,100

Fee: $3,149.68 paid to City of Irvine, California

Client: Standard Pacific Homes

Permit #: 00508318-RBP

61 Pathway, Irvine, CA 92618

Date: Sep 1, 2010

Permit type: New Construction

Description: 1 det prod condo plan 2 unit 35 casero phase 2 portola springs

Valuation: $21,496,500

Fee: $3,106.10 paid to City of Irvine, California

Client: Standard Pacific Homes

Permit #: 00508355-RBP

All data is collected from public records. We do not guarantee accuracy of information.