Architecture Permits in Hagerstown, MD

Date: Sep 9, 1994

Permit type: Architecture

Description: Entrance for 1 story dwelling hill-n-dale acres,lot 22 5/31/96 not complete-lar 6/7/96 18-month letter mailed-sls 10/3/96 revised drainage conditions "agreement sheet" to be signed by property owner regarding revision from 13x17 pipe to swale-lcs 10/10/96 received copy of signed agreement-sls 3/18/97 ok to release-lcs 3/24/97 released bond-sls

Client: Albert Eugene S Jr Et Al

Parcel #: 03603053500022

Permit #: 94-6479

Contractor: Frederick Seibert & Associates

Date: Sep 28, 1994

Permit type: Architecture

Description: An appeal from the planning commissions ruling from the adequate public facilities ordinance for denying a proposed four lot subdivision because the only road frontage (bobwhite lane) is an un- improved, unmaintained county road which the county apparently never intends to upgrade/main- tain

Fee: $75.00 paid to Washington County, MD

Parcel #: 03602014900000

Permit #: AP94-116

Contractor: Fox & Associates Inc

Date: Dec 22, 1994

Permit type: Architecture

Description: Pplat 71 lot subdivision rev.no.2 65 single family & 6 semi-detached dwellings * * * * * * comments from ed schreiber, permits & inspections 1/9/95. 1. a note should be added that states: lots 180 181, 183, 184, 192, 210 & 211 have greater side yard setbacks than those described on the typical building envelope due to drainage and utility easements. 2. a note should be added that states: a corner lot shall maintain the specified front yard set- back along both street frontages. setbacks from the remaining property lines shall be measured as if they were side yard setbacks. 3. as a p.u.d. the lot area and building setbacks were determined by the washington county planning commission. this was done by approval of the final development plan at their regular meeting on december 5, 1994 and signed by the planning director on december 12, 1994 and are shown on the typical on this plan. 4. a typical building envelope such as the one used for the final development plan should be shown. 5. a few of the white pines along sharpsburg pike should be shown as a part of phase 1. 6. if any forest conservation easements are to be located on individual lots, they should be shown. ens of comments to date. ejs 1/9/95. comments from gray hebb, engineering dept. 1-9-95 1. provide shop drawings and calculations for all box culverts. these culverts must be designed to meet all 4 md load limitations without postings. note; precast headwalls are not acceptable. 2. all roadway vertical alignment shall have aashto green book k valves so as to provide reqd stopping sight distance. it appears this was neglected in your design on lyles dr. 3. provide structural calculations to support weir design. 4. provide an hy-8 analysis on all culverts: hw/d max = 1.2. 5. provide computations indicating wr inlets located at stat. 10+60 st. george circle will intercept 130% of 2 yr. gutter flow. 6. grading plans must be provided on the final platsfor the followings lots: 183, 184, 16, 210, 211, 222, 223,192,193,194. all lots graded during roadway construction must have the following note added to final plats: grading on these lots cannotbe changed unless apprroved by the co. engineer. 7. add repair detail for repairing pavement open- ings in co. roads (detail attached to sht 12 of 238. provide a tee-turnaround with w-beam traffic barricade at the end of st. george circle. 9. provide a w-beam traffic barricade at the end of stephanie lane. a pressure treated barricade may be substituted but design must be approved by this office. 10. provide computations supporting outfall protection at pond spillway. show cross section of same. 11. eliminate the 2 vertical sag curves located atstations 16+50 and 17+75 lyles dr. combine into 1 curve. 12. add "contact the washington county engineeringoffice 5 days prior to the start of construction at 791-3133" to the sequence of construction. 13. revise roadway approval block to read "approv-ed for construction". 14. revise stone lined ditch details on sht 2 of 23 to provide filter fabric under stone. 15. revise notation: rc oval pipe to read "elliptical concrete pipe". 16. provide a 10 wide paved access apron into swm structure. approx. centerline station for thisaccess is 11+25 olivewood dr. location of gate shall be placed at this location. 17. provide riprap wave protection along dam at spillway. see marked-up plan for limits. 18. eliminate stormwater management easements around pond. this area will be dedicated in fee to the county. show on prel. and final plats. 19. add the following note on sht 20 of 23: "core trench and earth dam to be compacted to a minimum of 95% maximum dry density". 20. revise sections through spillways as shown on mark-up. 21. provide the following note on the extended detention outlet barrel: "all joints to be water tight". 22. revise core trench detail as shown on mark-up on sht 20 of 23. core trench must extend all the way to concrete outlet structure foundation. 23. provide top of constructed dam elevation on profile shown on sht 21 of 23. 24. show survey bench marks on the plans. 25. provide the following note in your sequence ofconstruction: "the dewatering device shall be removed after the site is stabilized and authori- zation is recd from the md dept of the environ- ment and the w.c. engineering dept." 26. provide a drainage easement over ditch that will convey runoff from commercial area to the swmstructure. easement shall be sized using the 10 yrstorm water surface elevation (in channel) plus 0.5 feet of freeboard, rounded up to the nearest 5.0 feet interval. this must be shown on both the prel. and final plats. end of comments. jan.

Fee: $2,660.00 paid to Washington County, MD

Client: St.James Corporation

Parcel #: 05715009200000

Permit #: PP-94-005

Contractor: Frederick Seibert & Associates

Date: Feb 16, 1995

Permit type: Architecture

Description: 4 lot sf res.subdiv.gloria wolford property(rev 1)gloria wolford - owner 3 immediate family lots, 1 unrestricted lot. zoning appeal(ap94-116)variance from apfo road adaquacy, to allow subdiv. on an unimproved, un- maintained co.road. road improvements currently being made. on-site forest retention proposed. planning comm postponed action on this plat at itsmay 1,1995 based on info provided in t.mcgees memo to r.arch dated 5/1/95 regarding problems in obtaining row for road improvements. (more) (entered 6/7/95 tal) county commissioners cut funding for road improvements from budget due to problems with obtaining cooperation from property owners for additional r.o.w. co.eng. will not approve subdivison unless road improvements are made. talked to mary llewellyn on 6/6; she may go back to the z.a.b. for a variance to create thelots without msking the improvements. . plat withdrawn on october 20, 1995 per letter from applicant (in file).

Fee: $502.50 paid to Washington County, MD

Client: Gloria L. Wolford

Parcel #: 03602014900000

Permit #: S-95-018

Contractor: Fox & Associates Inc

Date: Mar 18, 1996

Permit type: Architecture

Description: Replat to change front yard setback revision 1 zoning is rs. replat is to reduce developer imposed front yard setback from 50 feet to 40 feet. letter of approval from foxleigh meadows architectural committee is on file. original subdivision plat filed under foxleigh meadows sections a, b, & c. (s-88-025)

Fee: $85.00 paid to Washington County, MD

Client: Hetzer David E & Anita M

Parcel #: 02519077400027

Permit #: S-96-027

Contractor: Fox & Associates Inc

Date: Mar 4, 1997

Permit type: Architecture

Description: Pplat 54 lot subdivision rev.4 preliminary plat conforms to pud development plan engineering dept. comments-basements are not recommended for lots 147, 152, 153, 262, & 263. agencies comments and approvals that are currently outstanding are needed to address revisions to the construction drawings and should not effect the preliminary plat. . . engineering dept. comments 12-4-97 per rgh. second review 1. provide a grading plan, or include in overall grading, for lot 109 & 118. 2. provide drainage ditch calculations for the ditch running to the rear of lots 125-133. 3. provide drainage easements for the above refer-enced ditch. easement shall be sized by computing the top width at the design flow rate plus 1.0 offreeboard plus 5.0 on either side rounded up to the nearest 10.0. 4. what are velocities in this ditch? is standard soil stabilization matting adequate? 5. will an additional drainage easement be req. along the front of lot 118? this needs to be eval-uated. 6. after further discussion with the chief engineer we will require that the ditch line run- ning along most of lot 109, be eliminated and thatthe 30" storm drain pipe under samuel circle be extended to tie into a type k inlet at the 48" rcp under zemma lane. this will eliminate the guard rail and provide a buildable lot. in light of the above, revise storm drain system in front of lots 25 & 53 in phase 3 to provide the same inlet configuration as mentioned above. this required change will eliminate approximately 500 linear feet of guard rail on phase 3 & 4 which equates to a possible savings (including et-2000 end treatment) of $15,000 +/-. 7. make sure, by calculation, that these pipe extensions and inlets function hydraulically and meet our minimum design criteria. 8. we are still reviewing the box culvert design. comments will be forthcoming. end of engineering dept. comments. /jan.

Fee: $2,065.00 paid to Washington County, MD

Client: St James Corporation

Parcel #: 05715009200000

Permit #: PP-97-001

Contractor: Fox & Associates Inc

Date: Apr 22, 1997

Permit type: Architecture

Description: Pplat 35 lots-phase 3 st james village north rev 4.preliminary plat conforms to pud development plan.engineering dept. comments-basements are not .recommended for lots 20-28 & lot 245. agencies .comments and approvals that are currently out- .standing are needed to address revisions to the .construction drawings and should not effect the .preliminary plat. . comments from eng. dept. 5-2-97 1. proposed "finished floor elevations" shown mustindicate either a finished first floor or a finish ed basement floor elevation. 2. we were not able to find a bench mark on the plans. 3. provide grading plans for lots 27, 28 & 29 4. basements are not recommended for lots 20-28 & 245 in phase iii; lots 262, 263, 153, 152, 147 inphase iv. note: grading and associated notes must be shown on the final plats. 5. if lots 19, 243, and 244 are not part of this phase, shown them dash and a lighter line weight. 6. make sure you clearly delineate each phase on each phase on each respective set of drawings. where different phases join, indicate that phase on the plans. 7. provide a 15 ft wide pond access strip (in fee)out to lyles drive. 8. provide a 10 ft paved apron at access location.9. provide the min. stormwater management lot con-veyance as shown on sht. 5 of 15. 10. eliminate the ref. to msha class rip-rap in outlet protection details. stone sizes indicated do not always agree with this classification. 11. extend contours and topo a min. of 200 feet downstream of pond outlet. 12. provide a note on the plans indicating the entire pond area to be planted in grass only. 13. all notes concerning pond construction, i.e. grass, undercutting, compaction, etc. should be placed on pond detail sheet as "general notes". 14. provide a sequence of construction on the planin the sequence add the following note: "the de- watering device shall be removed after the site isstabilized and authorization is received from the md dept of the environment and wash. co." 15. provide a w-beam traffic barrier st. 34+00 lyles dr. right and left at the headwall of storm drain cross culvert. also station 12+00 mildred drcross culvert. 16. to save your client some construction costs, you could reduce concrete pipe class to a class ivon closed storm drain network. 17. show k values for all vertical curves on road-way profiles on both sections. 18. show design water surface elevations on the profile along the centerline of dam as shown on sht 12 of 13. 19. provide 1.0 foot of freeboard between the 100 year wsel and the top of the concrete weir struc- ure. 20. revise core trench on profile along centerlineof dam so it intersects the 10-year water surface elevation. 21. revise general structure note number 3 to in- dicate "boca 1993". 22. compute and plat hydraulic gradient thru the closed storm drain system. begin calculation withthe 10-year water surface elevation in the pond. 23. there are a few locations where ditch lines and associated roadway cross culverts should be enclosed with inlets and pipes. these areas should be re-evaluated. these could be potential problemfor the county and future lot owners. 24. construction of zemma lane in phase iii work must end at either station 10+50 +/- or extend to include the full intersection of samuel circle, see sheet 3 of 13. 25. provide a turnaround at the end of st. robertsdrive. comments are same for pp-97-001. end engineering dept. comments 5/2/97 per rgh.jan.comments from engineering dept. 12-4-97 per rgh second review 1. stormwater management pond boundary line as shown is unacceptable. why is boundary line still shown near outlet end of the stormwater managementpond? this needs to be revised to reflect ultimateoutlot conveyance. access shown is also unaccept- able. access cannot occupy a drainage swale. revise per previous comment or as another option put access over the 20 storm drain easement between lots 23 & 24 (see mark-up). 2. show grading for access road between lots 23 & 24. 3. provide a paved apron at access location on lyles drive. 4. remove msha classification of rip-rap at all outlet protection locations. 5. add a grading plan, or include in overall grad-ing, for lot 53 shown at the corner of bullock ct and roberts drive. 6. we were still unable to find a construction bench mark on the plans. please clarify this. 7. boring logs must be shown on the plans. 8. add the following note to both phases: "the washington county engineering dept. reserves the right to make modifications to shown ditch stabil-ization if, upon inspection, said stabilization isnot performing satisfactorily." end of engineering dept. comments. 12-4-97 /jan

Fee: $1,400.00 paid to Washington County, MD

Client: St James Village North Phase 3

Parcel #: 05715009200000

Permit #: PP-97-003

Date: Jul 16, 1997

Permit type: Architecture

Description: Entrance,grading,truck rental/repair facility above ground storage tank/pad,freestanding sign, on the premise sign . . . . . 8-4-97 original project set up for grading and entrance was applied for by asad ghattas kld 9/26/97 spoke with tim cambell.the footing inspection was not approved because of the use of shot rock fill in an area of the footing. originally said that this may not be a problem as long as the engineer would verify that the fill was acceptable with the building design.received some faxed reports from the engineer which gave no numbers but confirmed a visual inspection of the material.after some consideration our office spoke with mr cambell again and told him not to pour until the fill material and its quality were confirmed by his engineer.this call was made within 5 minutes of the original call. told mr cambell to cancel the concrete and to forward revised information with the engineers approval.at approximately 3:00 pm mr. prodonovich and myself stopped at the site.2 trucks had already deposited concrete in the footings at the fill areas and a 3rd truck had just pulled into site.spoke with the job super,bryan,and told him that there was to be no concrete poured as per my conversation with mr cambell.bryan said that he had not received the word so i had him call mr cambell and i told him a second time that there was to be no footings poured until the approvals from the engineer were submitted.allowed the contractor to finish with the 3rd truck but said there was to be no more work till certifications were received.wkv 9/9/97 spoke with mr cambell again and reiterated the need for the engineers approval.last conversation as per 2:00 were that he will have another soils engineer at the site to test the material and will give the results to the structural enginer and call us with the approval. told mr cambell again that there is to be no pouring until the soils fill areas have been approved.wkv 10/1/97 copy of soils report was faxed to the office.this was prepared by triad engineering and was sealed by a maryland p.e..called mr cambell and advised that it was ok to proceed and to call for the additional inspections when ready.noted this under inspections and gave copy of the report to the inspector.wkv

Fee: $947.60 paid to Washington County, MD

Client: Ghattas Enterprises

Parcel #: 02416094900000

Permit #: PRJ97-1635

Date: Oct 14, 1997

Permit type: Architecture

Description: Two entrances off e/s oliver drive and modifications to existing entrance off n/s maugans avenue for burger king site plan for burger king, sp-97-013 6/23/99 approved per site plan-gla spoke to engineering (lee snyder) and he is not satisfied that street repairs are made even after repeated meetings and calls to yvonne easton of two ton inc 9/16/99 checked with lee snyder, need to have this corrected/completed by 12/5/99. lee said he would call yvonne easton-sls to meet with engineering 10/5/99. why is this one being held up due to street repairs? this one hasnt received any type of letter-sls 10/5/99 lee snyder to send letter giving 30 days to correct the problem or make claim-sls 11/4/99 e-mailed lee snyder, i havent received copy of letter as of this date-sls bond expires 12/5/99 11/4/99 lee brought me a copy of letter dated 10/6/99-sls 12/7/99 ok to release bond per lee snyder-sls 12/9/99 release request sent to accounting-sls 12/22/99 accounting check #004339-sls

Client: Twoton Incorporated

Parcel #: 02415089700000

Permit #: 97-7841

Date: Sep 27, 1999

Permit type: Architecture

Description: Final plat 26 res lots & sr.living facility rev 124 lots for semi-detached dwellings and 2 lots forsingle or 2 family dwellings. 1.8 ac of open space120 unit sr.living facility. prelim plat appd by planning comm. 2/1/99. conditions of approval havebeen meet regarding buffer and robinwood dr imps.

Fee: $505.00 paid to Washington County, MD

Client: Triad Properties

Parcel #: 05015169300000

Permit #: S-99-098

Date: Dec 29, 1999

Permit type: Architecture

Description: Site plan for phased sanitary landfill rev 2this plan shows the location and phasing of the landfill "cells" and the proposed site improve- ments including. access road, landscaped berm and support facilities. detailed site plans for these facilities will be submitted at a later date. 189 acre "waste footprint" to last approx 80 yrs. mde permit pending. 400 perimeter buffer provided. . forest stand delineation appd 1/26/98 (fs-97-026) forest conservation plan appd 9/14/98 (fp-99-004) -more- f.c.p. calls for 10 planting areas along with landscape planting of the berm. . planning commission granted approval 2/7/00. contingent upon all approprate local, state, and federal agency review and approval. planning commission expressed need for screen planting along access road off of us 40.

Client: Wash Co Comm C/O Engineering Dpt

Parcel #: 03608008600000

Permit #: SP-99-043

Contractor: Frederick Seibert & Associates

Date: Apr 19, 2000

Permit type: Architecture

Description: Simpplat for property enlargement

Fee: $105.00 paid to Washington County, MD

Client: Twoton Incorporation

Parcel #: 02415089700000

Permit #: SI-00-013

Date: Jun 12, 2000

Permit type: Architecture

Description: Site plan for proposed 62 unit hotel revision 2proposed hotel is part of travelers plaza appd by b.z.a.(ap97-60). pedistrian access provided between parking lots and convenience store. forestconservation previous addressed through payment inleu of planting. subdiv.plat reqd.to convert previous simplified 3 ac parcel for development. . planning commission approved 7/10/00 with contingencies. see comment screen. . -more- forest conservation ordinance obligation addressedby payment in leu as part of sp-98-009. appd. 6/1/98 $17,337.00

Fee: $220.00 paid to Washington County, MD

Client: A C & T Company Inc

Parcel #: 0480408960000A

Permit #: SP-00-027

Contractor: Frederick Seibert & Associates

Date: Jul 5, 2001

Permit type: Architecture

Description: Simpplat for property enlargement

Fee: $105.00 paid to Washington County, MD

Client: Hockman Michael & Nancy

Parcel #: 05718007700000

Permit #: SI-01-024

Contractor: Frederick Seibert & Associates

Date: Sep 19, 2001

Permit type: Architecture

Description: Site plan wholesale auto parts business rev 2proposed 100x60 1 story building with paved parking and loading area. existing entrance off showalter rd to be used. 25buffer and screen planting along east prop.line adjacent to res. use provided per hi-1 requirements. no objection from airport. faa form 7460 redq. prior to const. . 10/1/01 comments from permits - kak 1. be more specific with functional description. what is being sold wholesale? 2. identify adjacent property owners and label any dwellings on adjacent properties. 3. provide more detail for ingress/egress to property. will access be from pennsylvania ave or showalter road? 4. there are two separate parcels - indicate both parcels. these parcels will need to be combined. 5. per assessment office these parcels are owned by george douglas and arthur messenger as of 6/1/01. verify ownership of parcel and provide and owners block and a developers block. 6. add note all signage shall comply with sec. 22.23 of the wash co zoning ordinance. 7. verify height of buildings - it says "3". 8. show location of 10x45 loading/unloading area as required in sec 22.13 9. indicate delivery requirements. 10. concur with comments from planning. kak *********** 10/11/01 - revision 1 comments from permits - kak 1. the word "trailer" located on the adjacent parcel is spelled wrong. 2. verify acreage of parcel 2. assessments has it as .97 acres-you have it as 1.97 acres on page 2 of 5. 3. the existing structure on this property which you have labeled as a house is an apartment. label this as an apartment building along with the number of rental units. 4. show detailed parking area/spaces for the apartment building. also provide the number of spaces required, number provided and formula used to figure parking on the site data. 5. minimum parking requirement is 9x20 space with a 25 ft access isle. parcels 1 and 2 need to be combined by simplified plat prior to siteplan approval to meet this requirement. sec. 22.12 6. need to provide right of way information from wash co permitting ingress/egress access across their property. 7. entrance/lane needs to be paved and access lane to loading area also needs to be paved. 22.14 8. need to provide 25 ft buffer. sec. 19a.8(a). 9. dumpster needs to be removed from parcel 2. if this is used by the apartment tenants, show location by the apartment building. 10. provide the owner/operators name, address and phone of "christy enterprises". -more- planning commission granted approval 11/5/01 contingent upon approval and recordation of the simplified subdivison plat to combine the two parcels.

Fee: $170.00 paid to Washington County, MD

Client: Kriner Russ

Parcel #: 02405105900000

Permit #: SP-01-062

Date: Oct 23, 2001

Permit type: Architecture

Description: Prelim plat/site plan 20 townhouse lots rev 3 vegitative screen planting provided along common boundry with brightwood sq. subdiv. forest conser-vation addressed with on-site planting area withinthe open space area. home owners assoc to own and maintain open space areas. apfo requirements for phase one have been meet. . planning commission granted approval on 1/7/2 conditioned upon all agency approvals and clarifi-cation of school bus pickup location with boe. possable need for ped. crosswalk. -more- prelim plat site plan revised and approved 1/3/03 to reflect modification to building setbacks on lots 22 and 30. this modification is also reflected on the final subdivision plat s-01-137 approved 1/3/03.

Fee: $1,332.50 paid to Washington County, MD

Client: Shaool Mansoor E

Parcel #: 05015160300000

Permit #: PSP-01-005

Contractor: Dan Ryan Builders, Inc

Date: Feb 22, 2002

Permit type: Architecture

Description: Construct a residential driveway for single familydwelling st james village north,phase 4,block b,lot 145 02/10/04 - swaled entrance is acceptable: drainage is able to convey across driveway without blockage, and current property owner is satisfied with swale. okay to release. js., eng. dept. 3/15/04 release letter miled. kdf

Client: Dan Ryan Builders Inc

Parcel #: 05715059200145

Permit #: 2002-01329

Date: Feb 20, 2003

Permit type: Architecture

Description: Create 3 sf lots on existing row by stacking ph planning commission granted variance on 3/3/03 with the following conditions. 1) the property may not be subdivided into more then 3 lots. lot 1 fronting fairview road shall be 1.5 acres, lot 2 shall not exceed 2.5 acres andlot 3 shall contain all of the remainder and shallnot be further subdivided. the lots shall be restricted to convayance to immediate family members for a period of 10 years from the time of subdivision approval.

Client: Davis Steve

Parcel #: 02304036200000

Permit #: SV-03-004

Contractor: Frederick Seibert & Associates

Date: May 6, 2003

Permit type: Architecture

Description: Proposed replat of 8 sf lots rev 3 lots 2-9 of sakech acres was originally subdivided in 1965. the replat is to show the reconfiguration of the subject lots with new lot areas and lot lines. planning commission gave approval to this reconfiguration in december 1995.

Fee: $515.00 paid to Washington County, MD

Client: Michael Andrew & Edna

Parcel #: 02305002500000

Permit #: S-03-077

Date: Jun 27, 2003

Permit type: Architecture

Description: Reduce access spacing requirement along state road

Client: Leather John W

Parcel #: 02614005800000

Permit #: SV-03-018